Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Default CatProduct to CatPart with link?

    Dear all,

    I have a project that is built bottom up. In other words, I have the components with detail, but need to size a frame that holds these components. What I am trying to find out is a way to use already assembled components (so already CatProducts) in order to size my final part, the frame.

    I have no idea how to do this best, but after plundering through the internet, I thought what could work is to make a CatPart_fromProduct of the CatProduct that I then can copy into my new CatPart(the frame). However I do not manage to setup an active link between the CatPart_fromProduct and the CatProduct. Additionally, the parts in the CatPart_fromProduct do not seem to be constrained! Like when I use the compass, I can still change the individual parts from their position!

    Anyhow, any help or suggestions would be much appreciated. There must be a straightforward way to do such a basic task. Thanks!

    •   AltAdvertisment

        

  2. #2

    Default CatProduct to CatPart with link?

    Hello all,

    I am trying to do the following: I have a few components that I have exact dimensions of, and I need to assemble them to a frame (so a bottom up approach). The frame needs to be sized so that it can hold all of these components correctly. I am not sure how to do this the smart way.

    So far I have prepared my components and already assembled them to subproducts. I would now like to take this subproduct and use it to size my new part.

    An idea I had was to convert the subproduct to a part (CatProduct -> CatPart), which I can then copy into my new part and use it to size my new component. However I do not find a way to keep an active link between these files, which sucks.

    So yeah, there must be a smart way of doing this... Kinda like in real life, where I can take the component, and with a pen draw onto a board to design the frame.

    Looking forward to your suggestions!

    •   AltAdvertisment

        

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,532

    Default

    I would not convert the assembly into a part.

    Instead, I would insert a new part into the assembly. This new part would be the frame. Then with the assembly open and displayed, I would make the Frame part the work object, and model it so it fits around all the other parts. (this is called "contextual design")

    •   AltAdvertisment

        

  4. #4

    Default

    Oh! This is great! I had seen this before, but not in this context, and thought it was bad practice to create a part within an assembly. (First create the part, then make product.)

    For those that will arrive to the same problem as I did, here a nice video that helped me understand: https://youtu.be/up-tXksJTS8

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,532

    Default

    Thanks for sharing the video - it does a much better job showing how to design new parts based within the context of the current assembly of parts

Tags for this Thread

 

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •